Wadham College, Oxford
Did that thin
letter with the college arms turn out to be an invite to your interview? If so, give yourself a big pat on
the back. Oxbridge has concluded that
you are “a realistic candidate”, i.e. a hard-working and high achieving
student. Roughly half of Oxford applicants are interviewed, partly on the basis
of how well they have done in pre-interview tests. Cambridge this year greatly extended
its use of such tests, but will still interview
a somewhat higher proportion. Since applicants vastly outnumber places,
many of those turned down are excellent students, too, and will doubtlessly
shine elsewhere.
Having named the
day for the lucky ones, meanwhile, Oxbridge dons hope to find some proof
of both mental skills and subject knowledge. While an ability to do well in
tests, think logically and express yourself clearly counts for much, wise
applicants therefore raise their game a little
further. Here are some of the best ways to do that:
·
Try to re-read or at least skim any book(s) you mentioned in your UCAS
statement, this time focusing on methods rather than findings or facts. How
exactly did Gregor Mendel discover the genetic basis of heredity? How might an
archaeologist research the lives of illiterate, long dead people?
·
Being familiar with the periods covered in your A-level history is
essential for subject applicants, of course, but you may also want to ask
yourself why some events within those still hugely resonate with us, while
others don’t.
·
An applicant for a course requiring students to solve mathematical
problems may need to practise showing (on paper or board) how they arrived at
the solution. It is not enough to just verbally present the interviewer with
it.
·
Make sure, too, that you can understand, define, spell and confidently
use the main subject terms. You don’t want to muddle up a reactant with a
reagent on that long, stressful day.
·
You also need to be
fairly up-to-date on developments in the subject area you expressed an interest
in. Have there been major new discoveries in the causes of earth quakes or the
development of human language?
·
What can be helpful, too, is a willingness to speculate when faced with
an unfamiliar scenario. The idea is to draw on what you know, but also use your
imagination (or an appropriate calculation). What would have happened if Churchill had died in
1939? Why might an economic theory not work in real life?
·
Lastly, be aware that to give a really good answer to an interview
question often means looking at a problem from more than one single,
narrow angle.
You’ll find links
to features which will help you give such academic answers in my
tweets @oxbridgentrance. For advice on how to do well in all
aspects of the interview, read the eight interview chapters of OXBRIDGE ENTRANCE: THE REAL RULES, available for next-day delivery from
Amazon.
No comments:
Post a Comment